Disintermediated Electoral Communication but How Truly Interactive?

Jair Bolsonaro and Twitter in 2018 Brazilian Presidential Election

Authors

  • Camilo De Oliveira Aggio Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30962/ec.1994

Keywords:

Online campaigning, Twitter, Jair Bolsonaro, Interaction

Abstract

Theoretical discussion and also empirical analysis about interactive features or “direct communication” in online enviroments are of extreme importance in online political campaigning literature. Twittter has been one or the main social media used by these political leaders , such as Donald Trump, Viktor Orban, Recep Erdogan and Jair Bolsonaro. Thei paper focus on the Brazilian case and aims at verify if and how the actual president of Brazil used Twitter to genuinely interact directly to Brazilian citizens during the electral period.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Camilo De Oliveira Aggio, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.

Doutor em Comunicação e Cultura Contemporâneas pelo Programa de Pós-graduação em Comunicação e Cultura Contemporâneas da Universidade Federal da Bahia com estágio doutoral na State University of New York at Albany, Alvany, Nova Iorque, Estados Unidos. Professor Adjunto do Departamento de Comunicação Social da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Credenciado ao Programa de Pós-Graduação da UFMG e pesquisador do Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Democracia Digital (INCT.DD).

References

AGGIO, Camilo. Os candidatos ainda evitam a interação? Twitter, comunicação horizontal e eleições brasileiras. E-Compós, v. 18, n.1, p. 1-22, 2015.

AGGIO, Camilo.; CASTRO, Filipe. “Meu partido é o povo”: uma proposta teórico-metodológica para o estudo do populismo como fórmula de comunicação política seguida de estudo de caso do perfil de Jair Bolsonaro no Twitter. Comunicação & Sociedade. No prelo.

ALVARES, Claudia.; DALGHREN, Peter. Populism, Extremism and Media: Mapping an Uncertain Terrain. European Journal of Communication, v. 31, n. 1, p. 46-57, 2016.

BALDWIN-PHILIPPI, Jessica. The Technological Performance of Populism. New Media and Society, v.1, n. 2, p. 376-397, 2019.

BARLETT, Jamie. Populism, Social Media and Democratic Strain. In: LODGE, Guy.; GOTTFRIED, Glenn. (Org.). Democracy in Britain: Essays in Honour of James Cornford. London: Institute for Public Policy Research, 2014.

BIANCALANA, Cecilia. Internet as a Tool of Disintermediation: The Case of the Five Star Movement (Italy). 2016. Disponível em: <https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/44240878-8a38-404c-99c2-cec904378ac9.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 Mar. 2020

CALÒ, Ernesto.; FAGGIANO, Maria Paola.; GALLO, Raffaella.; MONGIARDO, Melissa. Facebook, Digital Campaign and Italian General Election 2018: A Focus on the Disintermediation Process Activated By The Web. 2018. Disponível em: <http://www.carmaconf.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/8305.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 Mar. 2020.

CARLSON, Tom; GÖRAN, Djupsund. Old Wine in New Bottles? The 1999 Finnish Election Campaign on the Internet. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, v. 6, n. 1, p. 68-87, 2001.

ENGESSER, Sven.; ERNST, Nicole.; ESSER, Frank.; BÜCHEL, Florin. Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, v. 20, n.8 , p. 1109-1126, 2017.

GERBAUDO, Paolo. Social Media and Populism: an Elective Affinity? Media, Culture and Society, v.40, n.5, p. 745-753, 2018.

DAVIS, Richard; OWEN, Diana. New Media and American Politics. Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press, 1998.

DRUCKMAN, James N.; KIFER, Martin J.; PARKIN, Michael. The Technological Development of Congressional Candidate Websites: How and Why Candidates Use Web Innovations. Social Science Computer Review, v. 25, n. 4, p. 425-442, 2007.

ENLI, Gunn. Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. European Journal of Communication, v. 32, n. 1, p. 50-61, 2017.

GIBSON, R. K.; MARGOLIS, M.; RESNICK, M.; WARD, S. J. Election Campaigning on the WWW in the USA and UK: A Comparative Analysis. Party Politics, v. 9, n. 1 , p. 47-75, 2003.

HOWARD, Philip. N. New Media Campaigns and the Managed Citzen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

JACOBS, Kristof.; SPIERINGS, Niels. A Populist Paradise? Examining Populist’s Twitter Adoption and Use. Information, Communication & Society, v.22, n. 12, p. 1681-1696, 2019.

KAID, Lynda Lee; POSTELNICU, Monica. Political Advertising in the 2004 Election: Comparison of Traditional Television and Internet Messages. American Behavioral Scientist, v. 49, n. 2, p. 265-278, 2005.

KLOTZ, Robert J. Internet Campaigning for Grassroots and Astroturf Support. Social Science Computer Review, v. 25, n. 1, p. 3-12, 2007.

KLUVER, Randolph. Political Culture and Information Technology in the 2001 Singapore General Election. Political Communication, v. 21, n. 4, p. 435-458, 2004.

KRAMER, Benjamin. Populist online practices: the function of the Internet in right-wing populism. Information, Communication & Society, v. 20, n. 20, p. 1293-1309, 2017.

MOFFITT, Benjamin. Populism 2.0: Social Media and the false allure of “unmediated”representation. In: FITZI, G.; MACKERT, J.; TURNER, B.S (Org.). Populism and the Crisis of Democracy: Politics, Social Movements and Extremism. United Kingdom: Routledge, 2019. p. 30-46.

OTT, Brian .L. The age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the politics of debasement. Critical Studies in Media Communication, v. 34, n. 1, p. 59-68, 2016.

POSTILL, John. Populism and social media: a global perspective. Media, Culture & Society, v.40, n. 5, p. 754-765, 2018.

ROBLES-MORALES, José Manuel; CÓRDOBA-HERNÁNDEZ, Ana Maria The Disintermediation of the Agents: The Case of #UnidosPodemos. Suíça: Springer Nature, 2019.

SANCAR, Gaye. Ash. Political Public Relations 2.0 and the Use of Twitter of Political Leaders in Turkey. 2013. Disponível em: <https://www.ojcmt.net/download/political-public-relations-20-and-the-use-of-twitter-of-political-leaders-in-turkey.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 Mar. 2020.

SCHWEITZER, Eva Johanna. Election Campaigning Online: German Party Websites in the 2002 National Elections. European Journal of Communication, v.20, n.3, p. 327-351, 2005.

STROMER-GALLEY, Jennifer. Interação on-line e por que os candidatos a evitam. In: MARQUES, F. P. J. A.; SAMPAIO, R. C.; AGGIO, Camilo (Org.). Do clique à urna: internet, redes sociais e eleições no Brasil. Salvador: EDUFBA, 2013. p. 29-62. 2013. (v. 1).

TKACH-KAWASAKI, Leslie M. Politics@Japan: Party Competition on the Internet in Japan. Party Politics, v. 9, n.1, p. 105-123, 2003.

VRESSE, Claes. H. de; ESSER, Frank.; ALBERG, Toril.; REINEMANN, Carsten.; STANYER, James. Populism as an Expression of Political Communication Content and Style: A New Perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics, v.1, n.16, p.423-438, 2018.

Published

01-04-2020

How to Cite

Aggio, C. D. O. (2020). Disintermediated Electoral Communication but How Truly Interactive? : Jair Bolsonaro and Twitter in 2018 Brazilian Presidential Election. E-Compós, 23. https://doi.org/10.30962/ec.1994

Issue

Section

Artigos Originais