Excess and speed of information
Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the work of Brazilian journalists
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30962/ec.2426Keywords:
Science journalism, COVID-19, Pandemic, PreprintAbstract
In this article, we analyze the perception of Brazilian journalists who cover science on how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted their work. The study was conducted through an online survey with 26 professionals: 14 women and 12 men, most of them over 40 years old, with varied experiences in scientific journalism and who work in media outlets or autonomously in the states of PR, RJ and SP. Among the main changes of this period are the increase in the production of articles and the need to adopt strategies to find reliable scientific information, many of them published fastly or as a preprint (without peer review).
Downloads
References
ADEODATO, S. Jornalismo científico e as fantasias futurísticas. In: MASSARANI, L.; MOREIRA, I. C.; BRITO, F. (Orgs.). Ciência e público: caminhos da divulgação científica no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Casa da Ciência/UFRJ, 2002. p. 223-224.
BAGDASARIAN, N.; CROSS, G. B.; FISHER, D. Rapid Publications Risk the Integrity of Science in the Era of COVID-19. BMC Medicine, on-line, v. 18, n. 1, p. 1-5, 2020.
BASCH, C. H.; KECOJEVIC, A.; WAGNER, V. H. Coverage of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Online Versions of Highly Circulated U.S. Daily Newspapers. Journal of Community Health, on-line, v. 45, n. 6, p. 1089-1097, 2020.
BIORXIV. COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 Preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv. 2020. Disponível em: <https://connect.biorxiv.org/relate/content/181>. Acesso em: 29 set. 2021.
CALLAWAY, E. Preprints Come to Life. Nature, on-line, v. 503, n. 7475, p. 180-180, 2013.
CARVALHO, V. B.; MASSARANI, L. A ciência na TV aberta brasileira: reflexões sobre a programação de Globo e Record. In: VOGT, C.; GOMES, M.; MUNIZ, R. (Orgs.). ComCiência e Divulgação Científica. Campinas: BCCL/Unicamp, 2018, 274 p. 111-129.
CHEN, W.; STOECKER, C. Mass media coverage and influenza vaccine uptake. Vaccine, on-line, v. 38, n. 2, p. 271-277, 2020.
DAVYT, A.; VELHO, L. A avaliação da ciência e a revisão por pares: passado e presente. Como será o futuro?. História, Ciências, Saúde Manguinhos, on-line, v. 7, n. 1, p. 93-116, 2000.
DUNWOODY, S. Science Journalism and Pandemic Uncertainty. Media and Communication, on-line, v. 8, n. 2, p. 471-474, 2020.
FIGARO, R. (Coord.). Relatório dos resultados da pesquisa: como trabalham os comunicadores em tempos de pandemia da Covid-19?. São Paulo ECA-USP, 2020.
FISCHHOFF, B.; DAVIS, A. L. Communicating Scientific Uncertainty. PNAS, on-line, v. 111, p. 13664-13671, 2014.
FLEERACKERS, A. et al. Communicating Scientific Uncertainty in an Age of COVID-19: An Investigation into the Use of Preprints by Digital Media Outlets. Health Communication, on-line, p. 1-13, 2021.
FORSYTH, R. et al. Health Journalists’ Perceptions of Their Professional Roles and Responsibilities for Ensuring the Veracity of Reports of Health Research. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, on-line, v. 27, n. 2, p. 130-141, 2012.
FRASER, N. et al. Preprinting a Pandemic: the Role of Preprints in the COVID-19 Pandemic [pré-print]. bioRxiv, on-line, p. 1-36, 2020.
GLASZIOU, P. P.; SANDERS, S.; HOFFMAN, T. Waste in COVID-19 Research. BMJ, on-line, v. 369, p. 1-2, 2020.
GOLDSTEIN, S.; MACDONALD, N. E.; GUIRGUIS, S. Health Communication and Vaccine Hesitancy. Vaccine, on-line, v. 33, n. 34, p. 4212-4214, 2015.
HORBACH, S. P. J. M. Pandemic Publishing: Medical Journals Strongly Speed up their Publication Process for COVID-19. Quantitative Science Studies, on-line, v. 1, n. 3, p. 1056-1067, 2020.
JARVIS, C. Journals, Peer Reviewers Cope with Surge in COVID-19 Publications. The Scientist, 17 mar. 2020. Disponível em: <https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/journals-peer-reviewers-cope-with-surge-in-Covid-19-publications-67279>. Acesso em: 29 set. 2021.
JOHANSSON, M. A. et al. Preprints: An Underutilized Mechanism to Accelerate Outbreak Science. Plos Medicine, on-line, v. 15, n. 4, p. 1-5, 2018.
KAISER, J. The Preprint Dilemma. Science, on-line, v. 357, n. 6358, p. 1344-1349, 2017.
KWON, D. How Swamped Preprint Servers are Blocking Bad Coronavirus Research. Nature, on-line, v. 581, n. 7807, p. 130-131, 2020.
LOPES, R. Médico são profissionais de maior credibilidade no Brasil, diz pesquisa. Folha de S.Paulo, Brasília, 20 jul. 2020. Disponível em: <https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/equilibrioesaude/2020/07/medicos-sao-profissionais-de-maior-credibilidade-no-brasil-diz-pesquisa.shtml>. Acesso em: 29 set. 2021.
MASSARANI, L.; BAUER, M. W.; AMORIM, L. Um raio X dos jornalistas de ciência: há uma nova “onda” no jornalismo científico no Brasil?. Comunicação & Sociedade, v. 35, n. 1, p. 111-129, 2013.
MASSARANI, L.; NEVES; L. F. F. Reporting COVID-19 Preprints: Fast Science in Newspapers in the United States, the United Kingdom and Brazil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, v. 27, n. 3, p. 957-968, 2022.
PEYRIN-BIROULET, L. Will the Quality of Research Remain the Same During the COVID-19 Pandemic?. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, v. 18, n. 9, p. 2142, ago. 2020.
TEIXEIRA, M. Pressupostos do jornalismo de ciência no Brasil. In: MASSARANI, L.; MOREIRA, I. C.; BRITO, F. (Orgs.). Ciência e público: caminhos da divulgação científica no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Casa da Ciência/UFRJ, 2002. p. 133-141.
UNODC. UN Tackles “Infodemic” of Misinformation and Cybercrime in COVID-19 Crisis. 2020. Disponível em: <https://www.un.org/en/un-coronavirus-communications-team/un-tackling-%E2%80%98infodemic%E2%80%99-misinformation-and-cybercrime-covid-19>. Acesso em: 29 set. 2021.
VAI, B. et al. Risk Perception and Media in Shaping Protective Behaviors: Insights from the Early Phase of COVID-19 Italian Outbreak. Frontiers in Psychology, on-line, v. 11, p. 1-8, 2020.
WHO – World Health Organization. NovelCoronavirus (2019-nCoV). Situation Report 13. 2020. Disponível em: <https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200202-sitrep-13-ncov-v3.pdf>. Acesso em: 29 set. 2021.
WORLDOMETERS. COVID-19 Coronavirus Pandemic. 2022. Disponível em: <https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/brazil/>. Acesso em: 5 abr. 2022.
YAN, W. Coronavirus Tests Science’s Need for Speed Limits. The New York Times, Nova York, 14 abr. 2020. Disponível em: <https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/14/science/coronavirus-disinformation.html>. Acesso em: 29 set. 2021.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Luisa Massarani, Luiz Felipe Fernandes Neves, Carla Maria da Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to this journal implies the transfer, by the authors, of the printed and digital publication rights. The copyrights for the published articles belong to the author, with the rights of the journal over the first publication. The authors can only use the same results in other publications, clearly indicating this journal as the source of the original publication. Because we are an open-access journal, the free-of-charge,educational, scientific, and non-commercial use of the papers is allowed, as long as the source is cited.
Authorship
Any person who has effectively participated in the conception of the study, the development of the experimental part, the analysis and interpretation of data and the final wording, is considered as an author. By submitting an article for publication in E-Compós Journal, the author agrees with the following terms: 1. The author keeps the rights on the article, but its publication in the journal automatically implies the full and exclusive disposal of the copyright rights for the first edition, without payment. 2. The ideas and opinions expressed in the article are the sole responsibility of the author, not necessarily reflecting the views of the journal. 3. After the first publication, the author is authorized to take additional contracts, independent of the journal, for the dissemination of the paper by other means (e.g. when publishing in the institutional repository or as a book chapter), provided that the complete citation of the original publication. 4. The author of a published article is allowed and is stimulated to distribute his work online, always with the proper citation of the first edition.
Conflicts of interest and research ethics
If the developed research or the publication of the article may raise doubts as to potential conflicts of interest, the author should declare, in a final note, that no links to funding bodies have been omitted, as well as to commercial or political institutions. Similarly, the institution to which the author is bound should be mentioned, as well as others that may have collaborated in the execution of the study, evidencing that there are no conflicts of interest with the result already presented. It is also necessary to inform that the interviews and experiences involving human beings have obeyed the established ethical procedures for scientific research. The names and addresses informed in this journal will be used exclusively for the services provided by this publication, not made available for other purposes or to third parties. The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. The licensing rights used by the journal consist in the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) license: sharing (copying and distribution of the material in any media or format) and adaptation (remix, transformation and creation of material from licensed content for any purposes, including commercial) are permitted.