Mapping the Use of Chatbots in Brazil by States, Capital Cities, and the Federal District

Authors

  • Sivaldo Pereira da Silva Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8767-7679
  • Felipe Soares de Moraes Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6585-9073
  • Gabriella da Costa Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
  • Naiara Marques de Albuquerque Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil
  • Amanda Xavier da Silva Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8108-7110

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30962/e-comps.3245

Keywords:

Government Communication, Conversational Agents, Chatbots, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Democracy

Abstract

This article aims to understand how automated conversational agents (chatbots) are being made available by the Executive Branch in Brazil, assessing their basic level of informational accuracy. A total of 212 departments from 53 governments – including state administrations, the Federal District, and Brazilian capitals – were examined, mapping 26 agencies with chatbots. Data were collected through targeted documentary research, conversational tests, and consultations with managers. Only 24% of the conversational tests produced adequate responses. Lack of resources, technological expertise, and data organization are among the main challenges reported by managers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sivaldo Pereira da Silva, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil

Doutor pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação e Cultura Contemporâneas da Universidade Federal da Bahia (Póscom-UFBA), com estágio doutoral na University of Washington, Estados Unidos. Professor da Faculdade de Comunicação (FAC) e do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação da Universidade de Brasília (PPGCOM-UnB). Atualmente, é coordenador do grupo de pesquisa Centro de Estudos em Comunicação, Tecnologia e Política (CTPol/UnB) e pesquisador do Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Democracia Digital (INCT.DD).

Felipe Soares de Moraes, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil

Master’s student in Communication at the University of Brasília (UnB). Holds a bachelor's degree in Journalism and Humanities from the Federal University of Southern Bahia (UFSB). Researcher at the Center for Studies in Communication, Technology and Politics (CTPol/UnB).

Gabriella da Costa, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

PhD candidate in Communication at Fluminense Federal University (UFF). Master’s degree in Communication from the Federal University of Bahia (UFBA). Researcher at the Institute of Science and Technology in Digital Democracy (INCT.DD) and at the Center for Studies in Communication, Technology and Politics (CTPol) at the University of Brasília (UnB).

Naiara Marques de Albuquerque, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil

Master’s degree in Institutional and Political Communication from the University of Seville, and a bachelor’s degree in Social Communication (Journalism) from the University of Brasília (UnB). Communication professional in the field of social impact. Researcher affiliated with the Center for Studies in Communication, Technology and Politics (CTPol) at the University of Brasília (UnB).

Amanda Xavier da Silva, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil

MBA in Data Science and Analytics from the University of São Paulo (USP/Esalq). Bachelor’s degree in International Relations and Political Science from the University Center of the Federal District (UDF). Government Relations professional. Researcher affiliated with the Center for Studies in Communication, Technology and Politics (CTPol) at the University of Brasília (UnB).

References

BARBER, B. R. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Londres; Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984.

BATISTA, G. O. S.; MONTEIRO, M. S.; SALGADO, L. C. C. Investigando chatbots governamentais: um panorama sobre a usabilidade dentro e fora do Brasil. In: WORKSHOP DE COMPUTAÇÃO APLICADA EM GOVERNO ELETRÔNICO (WCGE), 2022. Anais... [S.l.]: SBC, 2022. p. 73-84.

CASAS, J.; TRICOT, M.-O.; KHALED, O. A.; MUGELLINI, E.; CUDRÉ-MAUROUX, P. Trends & Methods in Chatbot Evaluation. In: ICMI ’20: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION, 25-29 out. 2020, virtual. Anais... Netherlands: ICM ’20 Companion, 2020. p. 280-286.

CASTOR, E. C. S.; FERNANDES, A. L.; MOTTA, A. C. G. D.; GARCIA, R. B.; LIMA, A. F. Chatbot: impactos no ambiente acadêmico de uma universidade do Rio de Janeiro. P2P & Inovação, on-line, v. 8, n. 1, p. 71-92, set. 2021/fev. 2022.

CHESTERMAN, S. Artificial Intelligence and The Limits of Legal Personality. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, on-line, v. 69, n. 4, p. 819-844, 2020.

DEIANA, G.; DETTORI, M.; ARGHITTU, A.; AZARA, A.; GABUTTI, G.; CASTIGLIA, P. Artificial Intelligence and Public Health: Evaluating ChatGPT Responses to Vaccination Myths and Misconceptions. Vaccines, on-line, v. 11, n. 7, p. 1.217, 2023.

FØLSTAD, A.; BJERKREIM-HANSSEN, N. User Interactions With a Municipality Chatbot-Lessons Learnt From Dialogue Analysis. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, on-line, p. 1-14, 2023.

GOMES, L. G.; OLIVEIRA, H. C.; CRUZ, D. A. Chatbots: aspectos de impacto para o desenvolvimento e avaliação. In: CONFERÊNCIAS IADIS IBERO-AMERICANAS WWW/INTERNET E COMPUTAÇÃO APLICADA, 2021. Anais.... Rio Claro: IADIS, 2021. p. 22-30.

GILLESPIE, T. Content Moderation, AI, and the Question of Scale. Big Data & Society, on-line, v. 7, n. 2, [s.p.], 2020.

GUNKEL, D. J. An Introduction to Communication and Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2020.

GUZMAN, A. L.; LEWIS, S. C. Artificial Intelligence and Communication: A Human-Machine Communication Research Agenda. New Media & Society, on-line, v. 22, n. 1, p. 70-86, 2020.

JAIN, M.; KUMAR, P.; KOTA, R.; PATEL, S. N. Evaluating and Informing the Design of Chatbots. In: DESIGNING INTERACTIVE SYSTEMS CONFERENCE, jun. 2018. DIS ’18: Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. Hong Kong: DIS, 2018; p. 895-906.

HSU, T.; THOMPSON, S. A. Disinformation Researchers Raise Alarms About A.I. Chatbots. The New York Times, on-line, 8 fev. 2023. Disponível em: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/08/technology/ai-chatbots-disinformation.html. Acesso em: 15 maio 2024.

KHAN, R.; DAS, A. Build Better Chatbots. Berkeley: Apress, 2018.

KULIGOWSKA, K. Commercial Chatbot: Performance Evaluation, Usability Metrics and Quality Standards of Embodied Conversational Agents. Professionals Center for Business Research, on-line, v. 2, n. 2, p. 1-16, 2015.

LANGEVIN, R.; LORDON, R.; AVRAHAMI, T.; COWAN, B.; HIRSCH, T.; HSIEH, G. Heuristic Evaluation of Conversational Agents. In: CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2021, on-line. Anais... Nova York: ACM, 2021. p. 1-15.

LOMMATZSCH, A. A Next Generation Chatbot-Framework for the Public Administration. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIONS FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES, 18., 18-20 jun. 2018. Anais... Zilina (Eslováquia): I4CS, 2018. v. 863.

LUCCHESI, I. L.; SILVA, A. R.; ABREU, C.; TAROUCO, L. M. R. Avaliação de um chatbot no contexto educacional: um relato de experiência com METIS. Revista Renote, on-line, v. 16, n. 1, p. 113-122, jul. 2018.

MACPHERSON, C. B. The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.

MAKASI, T.; NILI, A.; DESOUZA, K. C.; TATE, M. A Typology of Chatbots in Public Service Delivery. IEEE Software, on-line, v. 39, n. 3, p. 58-66, 2022.

MANGIPUDI, P. AI Powered Chatbots vs Human Agents: A Compatible Study on Customer Satisfaction. International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (IJCET), v. 16, n. 2, p. 11-36, mar./abr. 2025.

MCDANIEL, E.; GONG, G. The Language of Robotics: Use and Abuse of Personification. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, v. PC-25, n. 4, p. 178-181, 1982.

MEHR, H. Artificial Intelligence for Citizen Services and Government. Cambridge: Harvard Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation, 2017.

MUDOFI, L. N. H.; YUSPIN, W. Evaluating Quality of Chatbots and Intelligent Conversational Agents of BCA (VIRA) Line. Interdisciplinary Social Studies, on-line, v. 1, n. 5, p. 532-542, 2022.

NIELSEN, J.; MOLICH, R. Heuristic Evaluation of User Interfaces. In: SIGCHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 1990, Seattle. Anais... Nova York: ACM, 1990. p. 249-256.

PATEMAN, C. Participação e teoria democrática. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1992.

PERAS, D. Chatbot Evaluation Metrics. In: INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT “BUILDING RESILIENT SOCIETY, 36.; 14-15 dez. 2018. Economic and Social Development [Anais]. Varazdin: ESD, 2018. p. 89-97.

PETTERS, L. B. Chatbots em campanhas de sensibilização, narrativa conversacional e possibilidades interativas: o caso do bot Fabi para Unicef Brasil e Facebook. Comunicação, Mídia e Consumo, São Paulo, v. 16, n. 46, p. 252-270, 2019.

RADZIWILL, N.; BENTON, M. Evaluating Quality of Chatbots and Intelligent Conversational Agents. Software Quality Professional, on-line, v. 19, n. 3, p. 25-36, 2017.

REINA, D. R.; CRUZ, C. Curadoria de chatbots: conceptualização, estratégias e indicadores de desempenho. Revista Ibérica de Sistemas y Tecnologías de Información, on-line, n. 40, p. 1-14, 2020.

SANTOS, G.; SILVA, W.; VALLE, P. H. D. O que sabemos sobre testes em chatbots? Uma revisão sistemática da literatura. In: WASHES – WORKSHOP SOBRE ASPECTOS SOCIAIS, HUMANOS E ECONÔMICOS DE SOFTWARE, 9., 2024, Brasília/DF. Anais... Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, 2024. p. 106-117.

SANTOS, L.; POLIVANOV, B. O que têm em comum Alexa, Siri, Lu e Bia? Assistentes digitais, sexismo e rupturas de performances de gênero. Galáxia, São Paulo, n. 46, p. 1-25, 2021.

SHIRAISHI, G. F.; YODA, F. S.; LOURENÇO, V. C. Para o high-tech ser high touch: um estudo exploratório com chatbots. Administração em Diálogo, São Paulo, v. 22, n. 1, p. 19-34, 2020.

SIMONDON, G. Du mode d’existence des objets techniques. Paris: Aubier, 1958.

TURNER, J. Robot Rules: Regulating Artificial Intelligence. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.

WACH, K.; DUONG, C. D.; EJDYS, J.; KAZLAUSKAITE, R.; KORZYNSKI, P.; MAZUREK, G.; PALISZKIEWICZ, J.; ZIEMBA, E. The Dark Side of Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Critical Analysis of Controversies and Risks of ChatGPT. Eber, on-line, v. 11, n. 2, p. 7-30, 2023.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

24-11-2025

How to Cite

Pereira da Silva, S., Soares de Moraes, F., da Costa, G., Marques de Albuquerque, N., & Xavier da Silva, A. (2025). Mapping the Use of Chatbots in Brazil by States, Capital Cities, and the Federal District. E-Compós, 29. https://doi.org/10.30962/e-comps.3245

Issue

Vol. 29 (2026): E-Compós 2026

Section

Artigos Originais

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Sivaldo Pereira da Silva, Felipe Soares de Moraes, Gabriella da Costa, Naiara Marques de Albuquerque, Amanda Xavier da Silva

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The submission of originals to this journal implies the transfer, by the authors, of the printed and digital publication rights. The copyrights for the published articles belong to the author, with the rights of the journal over the first publication. The authors can only use the same results in other publications, clearly indicating this journal as the source of the original publication. Because we are an open-access journal, the free-of-charge,educational, scientific, and non-commercial use of the papers is allowed, as long as the source is cited.

Authorship

Any person who has effectively participated in the conception of the study, the development of the experimental part, the analysis and interpretation of data and the final wording, is considered as an author. By submitting an article for publication in E-Compós Journal, the author agrees with the following terms: 1. The author keeps the rights on the article, but its publication in the journal automatically implies the full and exclusive disposal of the copyright rights for the first edition, without payment. 2. The ideas and opinions expressed in the article are the sole responsibility of the author, not necessarily reflecting the views of the journal. 3. After the first publication, the author is authorized to take additional contracts, independent of the journal, for the dissemination of the paper by other means (e.g. when publishing in the institutional repository or as a book chapter), provided that the complete citation of the original publication. 4. The author of a published article is allowed and is stimulated to distribute his work online, always with the proper citation of the first edition.

Conflicts of interest and research ethics

If the developed research or the publication of the article may raise doubts as to potential conflicts of interest, the author should declare, in a final note, that no links to funding bodies have been omitted, as well as to commercial or political institutions. Similarly, the institution to which the author is bound should be mentioned, as well as others that may have collaborated in the execution of the study, evidencing that there are no conflicts of interest with the result already presented. It is also necessary to inform that the interviews and experiences involving human beings have obeyed the established ethical procedures for scientific research. The names and addresses informed in this journal will be used exclusively for the services provided by this publication, not made available for other purposes or to third parties. The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. The licensing rights used by the journal consist in the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) license: sharing (copying and distribution of the material in any media or format) and adaptation (remix, transformation and creation of material from licensed content for any purposes, including commercial) are permitted.